Raleigh’s Race Is On

Raleigh’s Race Is On

With Election Day in sight, Raleigh candidates share their take on top local issues.

It’s officially that time of year again—time to vote for the leaders of our city. 

Historically, Raleigh isn’t known to exactly race to the ballot box for municipal elections, but—in case you missed it—we should. The so-what factor for local elections really comes down to the direct impact the mayor and city council has on our day-to-day lives: development and infrastructure, affordable housing, public transportation and so on. Dig the accelerated development? Hate it? Guess what—it’s these very people who will be making decisions on those exact topics  over the next several years.

Now on the heels of electing Raleigh’s youngest and most diverse council in our city’s history—and after two years of many deadlocked votes and stalled efforts—all eyes are on this year’s race. After incumbent Corey Branch swapped his mayoral campaign for a last-minute bid for District C, you’ll see a bunch of familiar names on the ballot as all current council members (minus Mayor Baldwin) aim to hold their seats.

But the seasoned incumbents aren’t stopping a wide range of first-timers and other familiar faces from throwing their hats in the ring in hopes of bringing their visions for the city to fruition. So if you want a say in the management and development of your city, it’s time to get registered (you have until Friday, Oct. 11) and pick which candidates best align with your vision for the City of Oaks. As we say, if you want to use your voice to complain, use it first to vote.

As Nov. 5 grows closer, here’s a snapshot of who’s running—and their takes on this election season’s hottest issues. We’ll see you at the polls, Raleigh. 

Mayor

Janet Cowell
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?Yes, Raleigh will continue to grow. Our task is to pursue thoughtful growth with community benefits to make Raleigh a city that works for everyone. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes, I support competitive pay for Raleigh police and other first responders.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
No, because while increasing affordable housing is a goal I wholeheartedly support, mandating affordable housing is not legal under current NC law. We can use tools like tax increment grants and financing to increase revenue that can be used to subsidize affordable units, better utilize government-owned land for housing, and pursue other creative approaches.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
Yes, I favor expansion of transit including Bus Rapid Transit, rail and investments in our airport. 

Paul Fitts
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?We need to target underutilized properties and existing infrastructure for the purpose of building up. It doesn’t have to be massive, but we have a need for more 24/7 living inside the city to stem our economic shift and balance our nontaxable burdens. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
If the Democrat-controlled council hadn’t focused on one park for 10 years, they could have noticed that our police department needs more people. Are they underpaid? Absolutely. Are they overworked and underpaid? Absolutely. It’s not just about pay—they need help. They need relief. They need someone who will watch their backs. It’s interesting that when I announced I was running, I said ‘Raleigh needs 400 more cops’ and now the [Police Benevolent Association] says we need the same number. Our public safety members are stretched too thin and it boggles our current council on why officers leave for other agencies.

If you were presently on Raleigh City Council, would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future development?   
Econ 101: You can’t make housing ‘affordable’ until you make housing available. The council hasn’t even attempted to approach the state for underutilized properties for repurposing. It will be a priority for me, and, truthfully, I’ve already had favorable discussions with ranking members of our General Assembly to get it done. I look forward to making these properties breathe new life into our city.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
No light rail, our bus system is underutilized as it is. I’d rather incorporate and subsidize ride-share companies for point-to-point transit. As I stated in 2017 regarding light rail, using a light rail is a 19th century answer for a 21st century workforce issue. Telecommuting is the future of work transit. Low and behold, I looked like Nostradamus when the pandemic hit. And now since our workforce has shifted, we need to make up for our economic shortfalls by having people live in areas where workers aren’t coming back—hence using state property to become owner-occupied housing.

Eugene Myrick
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
I am not in favor of building towers because they often cause increased strain on infrastructure. Our focus should be on responsible, community-centered development that preserves the integrity of our neighborhoods and ensures sustainable growth for all Raleigh residents. I believe that growth is essential for Raleigh’s future, but it must be responsible growth that truly benefits our community. I am supportive of continued development as long as it aligns with the needs and desires of our residents. However, I am also committed to ensuring that this development is done thoughtfully and with careful consideration of its impact. To achieve this, I would suggest site visits for every rezoning case. This allows for a thorough understanding of the specific area, its current dynamics and the potential effects of new development. By seeing the sites firsthand, we can make more informed decisions that respect the character of our neighborhoods while promoting smart growth.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
The RPD should definitely receive a pay increase to ensure their compensation is competitive with surrounding areas. A 15% increase would not only help in retaining and attracting quality officers, but also demonstrate our commitment to those who protect and serve our community. Additionally, the ACORN (Acute Crisis Outreach and Response Network) unit is a critical necessity, as it alleviates the workload on officers by providing individuals in mental crises with qualified assistance. This combined approach will enhance public safety while addressing the diverse needs of our community effectively. Moreover, competitive pay is a key factor in retaining experienced officers who know our city and understand the unique needs of our neighborhoods. By investing in our police force, we invest in the safety and security of Raleigh, ensuring that we continue to build a city where everyone feels protected and valued. Balancing growth with competitive pay for our officers ensures we maintain a strong and effective force to support our community. This raise is a necessary step toward achieving that goal.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Yes, if I were presently on Raleigh City Council I would support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development. However, it’s essential to redefine what ‘affordable’ truly means for our community. Instead of relying solely on the Area Median Income (AMI) as the standard, I propose using the Neighborhood Median Income (NMI) to set affordability guidelines. This approach ensures that housing remains accessible to residents based on the income levels specific to their neighborhoods, creating more equitable and realistic pricing structures. Furthermore, I believe the city should actively use city-owned land to develop affordable housing. By leveraging these public assets, we can ensure development serves the broader community and addresses the pressing need for affordable housing. This strategic use of land will allow us to build more inclusive neighborhoods and create opportunities for all Raleigh residents to thrive, including our civil servants, teachers and low-wage earners. Through these combined efforts, we can promote responsible growth that genuinely meets the needs of our diverse population.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit?
I am in favor of expanding mass transit in Raleigh, but I believe we must approach it thoughtfully and prioritize immediate improvements to our existing bus system first. Enhancing our current bus transit by keeping pay and benefits competitive for drivers, increasing the frequency of bus services, and ensuring that all bus stops are equipped with shelters are essential steps to better serve our community now. While a light rail system or other forms of mass transit could be valuable long-term solutions, we must first address the pressing needs of our current transit infrastructure. By improving the reliability and accessibility of our bus system, we can build a strong foundation for any future expansions. In considering light rail or other mass transit options, we must ensure that such developments are equitable, environmentally sustainable and beneficial to all residents, particularly those in underserved communities. The expansion of mass transit should enhance connectivity without displacing residents or contributing to gentrification. In summary, I support the exploration of light rail and other mass transit expansions, but I firmly believe that we must first invest in and improve our existing bus system to ensure it meets the needs of all Raleigh residents.

Terrance Ruth
Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Affordability has to remain at the top of everyone’s policy platform. We are in a housing stock deficit. The only way we can address this deficit is by increased home production. I believe  Raleigh’s growth and development must be balanced with the needs and concerns of our community. The top concern for residents is affordability. Once a city becomes unaffordable, it is difficult to become affordable again. While infrastructure and new buildings can bring economic opportunities, we must also ensure that development is inclusive and considers the long-term impact on all residents, particularly those in historically marginalized communities. The pace of development should be guided by our capacity to maintain affordability, protect our environment and enhance the quality of life for everyone. We are experiencing housing insecurity in our city and it is impacting how secure residents feel about the future of our city. I created a podcast called Illogical by Truth, which covers this topic.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Police officers cannot afford to live in Raleigh. Actually, 15% would still be insufficient. A report showed that a single individual needs $100K in salary. Affordability has to remain at the top of everyone’s policy platform. We are in a housing stock deficit and it is making it hard for the city to care for its employees. We are experiencing housing insecurity in our city and it is impacting how secure residents feel about the future of our city. Public safety is crucial, and we must ensure that Raleigh is competitive in attracting and retaining skilled officers. However, any increase in police pay should be part of a broader conversation about how we allocate resources to public safety, including investment in community-based approaches, mental health services and programs that address the root causes of crime. I would support a pay raise if it aligns with a comprehensive plan that ensures all aspects of public safety are adequately funded and prioritized. We can afford to keep a low retention rate for officers. We train officers and then lose them to surrounding municipalities due in part to pay and low rates of crime.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
I strongly support the inclusion of affordable housing components in all future developments. Affordable housing is critical to ensuring that Raleigh remains a city where people of all income levels can live and thrive. We need policies that not only require affordable housing but also ensure that these units are truly accessible to those who need them most. Our AMI for affordable housing is a range from $80K to $0 in salaries that qualify for affordable housing. We need to build at all income levels so those with spending flexibility do not purchase the naturally occurring affordable housing. In the county, we are 65,000 units in deficit and that is roughly worth 3.2 billion dollars. We are experiencing housing insecurity in our city and it is impacting how secure residents feel about the future of our city. I created a podcast called Illogical by Truth, which covers this topic.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
I am in favor of expanding mass transit, including the potential development of a light rail system. Effective public transit is essential for reducing traffic congestion, promoting environmental sustainability and ensuring equitable access to all parts of the city. Any expansion should be thoughtfully planned to serve our growing population and connect communities that have historically been underserved by public transportation. The more we can become a municipality that is less car dependent the more we can improve the quality of life of residents. I want to secure Raleigh in 2024.

James Shaughnessy IV
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
Yes, I support continued development. Previous administrations dropped the ball on development and planning. Now, we find ourselves playing catch-up. Increasing the availability of housing is essential for creating a more competitive market, which in turn drives down costs and makes Raleigh more accessible for everyone. Properly managed development is crucial for accommodating our newcomers, but most importantly our current residents.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes, I support a 15% pay increase for the Raleigh Police Department to ensure we remain competitive with surrounding areas. I would even go further to make it significantly higher than surrounding areas. Additionally, it’s important that senior officers have the opportunity to reach the top of their pay tier based on merit and experience. We are a capital city and therefore should be attracting the most talent. We should set the standard for the state and not lose our officers to smaller departments because of paltry pay. By investing in our law enforcement officers, we not only improve their morale and retention but also enhance the safety and security of our community. 

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
I would not require affordable housing in all future developments, but I do believe it should be included where it makes sense. Blanket requirements can sometimes stifle development and lead to unintended consequences. Instead, we should take a targeted approach, ensuring affordable housing is incorporated in areas where it can have the most impact and where it aligns with broader community planning goals.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
Light Rail: No. Expansion of mass transit: Yes. Currently, the number of transit riders in Raleigh does not justify the massive investment required for a light rail system. Additionally, light rail would require collaboration with other municipalities and substantial funding from them, making it an impractical option at this time. However, I fully support expanding, adapting and improving our existing mass transit options. By enhancing what we already have, we can encourage more ridership and demonstrate that public transit is a viable and valuable option for our community.

District A

Mary Black
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
Regarding Raleigh’s development, I support a balanced approach. It’s essential to continue developing the city’s infrastructure, but this development must be smart, equitable and aligned with community needs. We should prioritize projects that address affordable housing, sustainable transportation and community amenities, rather than allowing unchecked growth that could lead to gentrification or environmental harm. We need to be mindful of the pace and scale of development to ensure it benefits all Raleigh residents and doesn’t exacerbate existing inequalities. Equitable development goes beyond just building towers or not. That’s why I support flexible rent assistance, enhanced landlord incentives, move-in support, targeted permanent housing placement for the unsheltered, and improved coordinated entry systems. I also believe it is necessary to implement a displacement preference policy to stabilize low-income tenants and prioritize those experiencing homelessness, directly addressing rising encampments and shelter strain. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
I support ensuring fair compensation for all city workers and believe any pay increases should be part of a broader conversation about community safety and worker rights across all city departments. Additionally, it’s important to prioritize pay increases for all safety and operations workers, not just to make Raleigh competitive, but to ensure that these essential workers have the option to live in the city they serve. By addressing pay and benefits comprehensively, including protections like those in a Workers Bill of Rights, we can create a more equitable and sustainable approach to compensation that benefits the entire community.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
I support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential developments. This approach is essential for addressing the housing crisis and ensuring Raleigh remains accessible to people of all income levels. Integrating affordable housing into new developments helps prevent the displacement of low-income residents and fosters inclusive communities. Moreover, it’s crucial to pair this with robust tenant protections. This includes advocating for just-cause eviction protections, strengthening tenant rights against arbitrary rent increases, and enhancing enforcement of housing regulations. Providing legal aid and educational resources for tenants, promoting transparency in rent practices, and collaborating with advocacy groups to address systemic housing challenges are also important. By ensuring affordable housing and tenant rights are prioritized together, we can create a more equitable and supportive housing environment for all residents.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
Yes, I am in favor of expanding mass transit, including the development of a light rail system. This expansion is vital for reducing traffic congestion; lowering carbon emissions; and ensuring equitable access to jobs, education and services. I am particularly enthusiastic about the potential impact of projects like the S-Line Raleigh to Richmond (R2R), which will enhance regional connectivity. Furthermore, I emphasize the importance of equitable development in the implementation of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in Raleigh. The Wake County Transit Plan’s focus on building BRT corridors presents a significant opportunity to improve public transportation efficiency and support vibrant, walkable communities around these routes. It is crucial that we design these expansions with a focus on accessibility, affordability and environmental sustainability to ensure all residents benefit from the improvements.

Whitney Hill
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
Yes. Build, build, build! [On] all levels and a temporary hold on tearing down affordable housing until we get caught up.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes. I believe Raleigh police have the toughest job in the Wake County area and should make top pay; however, we need to get them there with a progressive plan over a few years. Training new officers and having them leave for other cities is a waste of money and a brain drain.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
No. I am not so sure this is a really great approach; however, I do feel we need to develop some policies to ensure we are building at all levels. The city has a tremendous amount of power with zoning to deal with builders to make this happen. Time also to stop slowing walking zoning changes and continually punt them to the next year.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit?
Not sure. We are in the telecommute age. A major share of the professional population stays at home to work at least some days. The proposed plan will not include the airport. Is anyone going to ride this or are the taxpayers going to have to pick up the tab for a white elephant that will be a homeless hotel?

Mitchell Silver
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
Raleigh is growing, and we can’t pump the brakes on that. Refusing to accommodate and plan responsibly for growth is not sustainable or reasonable. As a professional planner, I’ve seen where that approach leads to unaffordable housing, gentrification and displacement, and increased inequity. As Raleigh’s Planning Director from 2005 to 2014, I led the 2030 Comprehensive Plan that identified eight growth centers connected by twelve multimodal transit corridors. This created a predictable blueprint for where Raleigh can accommodate additional density and protect existing neighborhoods. As a member of City Council, my priority will be ensuring Raleigh grows in the right places, with a focus on equity and sustainability. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes, Raleigh must have salaries that are competitive with surrounding areas and guarantee a living wage that ensures all first responders can live and raise a family here. Raleigh should lead the way on equitable pay and benefits, not simply trying to keep up with other municipalities.  

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
State law makes it challenging to enact effective inclusionary zoning policies. I support increased advocacy at the General Assembly to allow Raleigh and cities across the state to have the freedom to enact their own housing policies. There are essential steps we can take now to build more affordable housing. Based on my 40 years of urban planning experience, I would work to increase the affordable housing supply and preserve existing affordable housing by advocating for affordable housing bonds, working with the Raleigh Housing Authority and other affordable housing providers to increase the affordable housing supply, creating community land trusts, streamlining the approval and permitting process to keep development costs practical, supporting higher density development in the right places, and supporting density bonuses.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
Yes

District B

Jennifer McCollum
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
Yes, I am supportive of continuing to develop buildings and infrastructure for Raleigh. Currently, we have 50+ people moving to Raleigh daily. We must have a plan to house these individuals and families along with our current citizens in need of a home. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes, I am in support of increasing RPD salaries at least 15% to be competitive with surrounding areas. RPD should be able to afford to live in the city they protect.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
What I believe Raleigh future developments require most is a partnership between the city and builders. A synergistic approach, in conjunction with reduced regulatory barriers, will streamline the process of building affordable housing. This strategy leads to lower cost and increases the opportunity for more Raleigh citizens to be homeowners.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
No, I am not in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit. 

Megan Patton
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
Yes, towers have their place in urban centers. Certainly having a thriving downtown benefits residents all across the city, not only through providing jobs and walkable amenities but also by cross-subsidizing taxes for more suburban areas. Instructure can mean many things—from building police and fire stations to replacing water mains to resurfacing roads and building new ones. These investments sometimes come through private development and other times through city projects. I support well-defined plans that make sure we are budgeting for and replacing infrastructure before it fails, not after. I also support the continual refinement of our process for determining which investments are required through development activity versus which warrant a city project so we can meet the needs of our growing city.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
In the most recent budget cycle, we successfully delivered 10% raises to officers up to the management ranks. We also earmarked roughly $11M to implement the results of our ongoing pay study. I wholeheartedly support making sure all our city employees are compensated competitively. I also support being creative with our benefits to meet each department’s unique needs—for administrative employees that might be flexible hybrid work, while for RPD officers, it might be take-home cars. I want Raleigh to be a great place to work for all employees and I’m committed to supporting policies that make it a reality.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Yes, I certainly welcome the opportunity to add more tools to our toolbox as we work to ensure folks at all income levels can live and thrive in Raleigh. As with all policies though, the devil is in the details. Absolute mandates aren’t always the best fit for dynamic situations with an array of contributing factors. For instance, is the family building a granny flat in their backyard going to be required to rent it out rather than using it for, say, Granny? I would want to brainstorm with professionals: How many units before the requirement kicks in, what level of affordability, for how long, etc. We must absolutely ensure that there are affordable housing options across our city, and we need to invest the time and effort to make sure we get it right for all Raleigh residents.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit?
Yes to transit! Bus Rapid Transit, like the system we’ve been working to scale in Raleigh, is really gaining traction across the country due to its relative ease of installation and adaptability as a city evolves. I would support the acceleration of our existing plans and work to provide more frequency on our fixed route lines along high-ridership routes. Light rail has been explored for Raleigh and was found to be too expensive. We’ve also seen some cities that invested in light rail have struggled to evolve their systems with the changing remote-work landscape. Ultimately, I want a livable planet for my daughter, my neighbors’ kids and generations to come. Transportation is one of our highest carbon emitters. If every Raleighite can begin to replace even one weekly car trip with a bus ride, we can have a measurable positive impact on the climate.

District C

Corey Branch 
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
Yes, I support continued development to increase density in strategically selected areas that can accommodate growth. Some examples of such locations include the Tower Shopping Center off New Bern Avenue and I-440, the former DMV site with about 12 stories, Downtown, Downtown South, Brier Creek within airport height limits, and other urban mixed-use settings.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes, I support a 15% pay increase to ensure Raleigh’s police officers are competitively compensated compared to surrounding areas. While keeping a balanced budget in mind, I also emphasize the importance of competitive benefits, because Raleigh’s health coverage reduces out-of-pocket costs for our officers. We’ve already implemented a 10.3% average increase and are awaiting further data from our pay study to guide us forward.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development?  
Yes, I would support the inclusion of affordable housing components in future residential developments. I’m committed to collaborating with the community, city staff and developers to explore the most effective options for integrating affordable housing, as well as methods of instituting those options in District C and throughout the city.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit?
Yes, I fully support expanding mass transit options, including the development of a regional rail system. While light rail without state support is cost-prohibitive, I am committed to working with federal and state transportation departments, GoTriangle, and regional municipalities to create a comprehensive transit system, enhanced by improved bus connectivity. 

DaQuanta Copeland
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?No, I’m supportive of developing mixed-income housing options to address the housing crisis instead of developing options most current residents will never enter in. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
No, council doesn’t have the ability to require affordable housing components in development, but I would advocate to incentivize developers to add affordable housing components in their projects. 

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
Yes, I support providing connective transportation options for all residents. 

Tomara DeCosta 
Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes, I am wholeheartedly in support of initiatives aimed at improving our city and making it a vibrant, desirable place to live and work. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes. I would propose a 20% salary increase to retain current officers and attract new talent.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
No. Residential developers should not be mandated to include affordable housing components, regardless of building height. It is important to ensure that higher-income applicants are not discriminated against, while also avoiding unfair advantages for lower-income applicants. 

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
A light rail system would be a great addition for the city; however, I would reassess the $3 billion initial cost and the $42 million annual maintenance expense. I am against Bus Rapid Transit in Raleigh. 

Daniel Grant-King 
NO ANSWER AS OF PRESS TIME

Jared Ollison
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
No. I would not consider myself supportive of building tall towers. I do, however, support investing in our general infrastructure. I think it is now time to restore the city we have, and then focus on measured growth that includes protecting all of Raleigh’s citizens.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes. The safety of our great city must be a top priority. In order to recruit and retain professional law enforcement officers, we need to focus on providing them with comparable pay and benefits commensurate with surrounding areas. 

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Yes. I would support affordable housing components in all future residential developments that are supported by any public funds, to include tax incentives. 

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
Yes. I am in favor of light rail and mass transit expansion so long as it does not disenfranchise already vulnerable communities.  

Tolulope Omokaiye 
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
I am for Raleigh building buildings that are useful to the community and infrastructure that smartly supports the growth we are experiencing and want to see. I am not for building towers just for the sake of ‘development,’ especially if it will lead to displacement and does not help solve our housing crisis. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
I would support raising RPD’s salary to help fill the shortage and retain officers in the city. 

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
I am not presently on the Council, but I do support affordability requirements that can actually help fill the needs. I am not for requirements that only scratch the surface like 10 or 20 units out of 200.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
I am in favor of well-planned mass transit expansions done equitably and sustainably.

Portia Rochelle
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
Yes, supportive of current development.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes, it would prevent the City spending funds on training and police leaving to gain a competitive advantage.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Yes!

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit?
I am in favor of a light rail.

District D

Jane Harrison 
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
In evaluating development proposals, I examine the City’s comprehensive plan and community area plans. I analyze staff reports on infrastructure concerns. I also assess opportunities for public benefits like affordable housing, greenway connections and green stormwater management. And I consider perspectives from impacted neighbors.
Growth adds to our tax base which allows the City to pay for improvements, from sidewalk repairs to parks to new sports and entertainment venues. Growth also puts a strain on resources, and the City must reinvest in infrastructure and amenities for Raleigh residents to continue a high quality of life. It’s important to evaluate each development plan on its own merit. I do not apply a one-size-fits-all approach.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
In the last budget, City Council approved a 10.3% salary increase for public safety employees. We also launched an alternative crisis response program to hire social workers in multiple departments and provide resources to those in need—for example folks experiencing homelessness or mental health issues. We need to fully fund holistic public safety programs and ensure salaries are competitive with surrounding areas to increase recruitment and retention.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
As the city grows, we can’t leave people behind. I support initiatives to help residents stay in their homes, as well as new developments that provide affordable housing. At every Raleigh City Council meeting, we approve funds and policies to increase the availability of affordable housing and preserve affordable housing for low- and moderate-income residents. The City of Raleigh is purchasing property like the DMV site on New Bern Avenue to convert into income-restricted housing. We also provide funds to subsidize affordable housing projects and reduce rents in partnership with nonprofit housing developers. In June, City Council approved a new program to provide direct rental assistance for individuals experiencing homelessness. The idea is to get people into apartments and bypass shelter beds completely.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
Reliable public transit is critical. Light rail is not currently feasible in Raleigh but Bus Rapid Transit has great potential to expand mass transit. We must increase frequent bus service (every 15 minutes) and add shelters, seating and ADA-compliant landing pads to bus stops. GoRaleigh and regional transit systems like GoTriangle have millions of dedicated riders who depend on their services to reach work and home in a timely fashion and travel throughout our communities. I am dedicated to increasing frequent service, and building out Bus Rapid Transit and rail options like the S-line.

District E

John Cerqueira 
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
I support continued investment in our built environment with higher density development most specifically in our downtown where density is most appropriate and sustainable. This investment will drive toward a downtown we can enjoy and be proud of while supporting economic activity and associated tax revenue that can fund needs throughout the rest of our city,  including subsidies for affordable housing, outreach and support for chronically unhoused citizens, and increased pay for our city staff—particularly first responders and investments in our parks and greenways.  

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas?  
Yes, with roughly 100 vacancies on our police force we must do whatever we can to ensure that police officers are well paid to attract and retain officers so our citizens’ fundamental need to feel safe is satisfied. Beyond that, I would like to see increased investment in equipment and training. 

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Requiring affordable housing in residential development is currently not allowed by NC state law. However, I am supportive of offering incentives to developers to make offering income restricted units at a lower price easier. Beyond that, I would also like to see the city engage developers who know how to create a critical mass of affordable units and do so profitably with a more in-depth familiarity of Tax Increment Financing and efficient building practices. 

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? Yes, although we may have missed our window on light rail, I am excited to see the expansion and, hopefully, accelerated completion of Bus Rapid Transit. 

Christina Jones 
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
I believe development must include improvement to our infrastructure. We are seeing a lot of stormwater capacity concerns inside the beltline due to infill development and that needs to be addressed.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Many first responders received a 10% pay increase in this year’s budget, which was twice as much as they received the year before. We will see the results of our compensation study and adjust pay rates accordingly.  

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Yes. If the state legislature would allow for inclusionary zoning, I would support that.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
I am in favor of accomplishing BRT so we can set the foundation for a growing transit system in Raleigh.  

At-large

James Bledsoe
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?Yes. I want development of housing and infrastructure. We need more housing, the infrastructure, to support it, etc. However, we need to stop throwing money into glamor projects and conserving Dix Park. We are never going to get a return of investment on it and we need to pay off our $2 billion in debt and pay our first responders.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas?  
Yes. RPD is one of the worst paid [law enforcement] agencies in NC. For decades, RPD has been asking for a time in grade and time in service pay scale and a good wage. Cutting the overpaid city manager’s salary, reducing drastically underperforming new departments, and cutting a lot of ‘investment’ spending will allow us to pay that wage without raising taxes. Crime is at historic highs—we need quality and well-paid officers to combat the 20 murders, 150 rapes and 50 cases of human trafficking so those numbers decrease in future years.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
No. I won’t force builders to slow their development at the behest of council. We need housing and ownership in Raleigh and council is slowing that progress.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
No. Let’s see how BRT handles its current route and if it is successful, then we can expand it.

Joshua Bradley
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
I would pump the brakes on luxury development until the needs of workers and other folks making less than 50% of the [area median income] are taken care of. Housing for workers, the poor and the unhoused should be the first priority of the city government.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
I would consider paying police more if they did not carry lethal weapons. I would consider paying a bonus for every year that there were no police killings of unarmed civilians. I believe that all city workers should be paid at least $26 an hour. I do not believe the police should have better pay or benefits than the fire workers, sanitation workers or other city workers.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Yes, 100%

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
As long as the zoning associated with it does not gentrify the surrounding areas and push out working people. The rezoning around the Bus Rapid Transit line is an engine of gentrification. If the city effectively zones out the people who use mass transit, then it is a waste of money.

Reeves Peeler
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
Yes. Raleigh should keep developing and we should continue to build infrastructure and more affordable housing. Raleigh should have a clear vision for what we want to develop and we should stick to our vision—which is housing that is affordable to lower incomes (such as teachers, nurses, city employees, service industry), more walking/biking friendly, and aligning with an expanding public transit system.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes, but only if we raised wages for all first responders at the same rate. Our firefighters operate at the same or sometimes an even bigger deficit in pay to surrounding neighbors than the police do, plus are extremely understaffed. 

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Absolutely, yes. There is no excuse for us not having done this many years ago. We have a massive affordable housing deficit and we are one of the only cities of our size nationally to not do this. 

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
Definitely, yes. We should be heavily investing in mass public transit and we are decades late on having a regional system across the Triangle.

Robert Steele
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
I consider myself to be supportive of continuing to develop, but it has to be done in a way that is responsible. Adding density to the city without proper forethought into the impacts to traffic, water quality, tree canopy cover and overall quality of life is reckless and irresponsible.

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
I would support a 15% pay increase for RPD, yes, though I would prefer to see a 20% increase.  RPD continues to have staffing issues due to loss of officers to other departments, which prevents us from building a proactive, community-focused department. A 20% increase would not just make RPD competitive, but make them desired.

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development?  
Yes, I would support affordable housing requirements in all future developments. To not do so is to intentionally force a segment of the population out of the city, which is discriminatory at best.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
I am in favor of further expansion of mass transit. As Raleigh did not grow over the last 40 years with the idea of mass transit in mind, it will take extensive thought into how to do it without it causing more problems than it solves, but mass transit is a necessary part of living in a city.

Stormie Forte
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?
I support continuing development in the City of Raleigh. To address the shortage of affordable housing in Wake County, we need to add 60,000 units. Wake County has approximately 55 people on average moving here daily, with half residing in Raleigh. The City of Raleigh is frequently in the top 10 of positive lists, which attracts Fortune 500 companies and generates interest in the MLB coming to the area. While we are making room for new folks, we also need to implement strategies for people who are already here and in need of housing. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
In the City of Raleigh budget this year, RPD allocated a 10% pay increase. Keeping good law enforcement officers is a priority and we want to continue to provide a competitive salary compared to other municipalities.  

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
If the General Assembly passed a law allowing/requiring affordable housing in future residential developments, I would support it. We are facing a major shortage of affordable housing in the City of Raleigh and any available methods that increase housing stock should be utilized. 

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
I am in favor of expanding public transit. There are a lot of people moving into the City of Raleigh that are coming from areas where there was an expansive mass transit system utilizing rail and buses. As our population grows we need to make sure public transportation is reliable and efficient. 

Jonathan Melton
Are you supportive of Raleigh continuing to develop towers, buildings and infrastructure?Yes, people are moving here and we need to make space in areas with existing employment and retail. Placing density in our urban cores, like Downtown, and along transit corridors increases our tax revenue, which supports city services like police, fire and parks, and is less strain on our infrastructure and better for the environment than sprawl. 

Would you support a 15% RPD raise to make Raleigh competitive with surrounding areas? 
Yes, we need a fully staffed and well-compensated police department, so our officers can live in the communities they serve and better address issues of public safety. I also support our efforts to separately fund and create an Alternative Response Unit to address other community needs. 

Would you support requiring affordable housing components in all future residential development? 
Yes, however, it is important to note that, to date, zoning conditions requiring affordable units in new residential developments have produced zero affordable units—even when they’re offered voluntarily, they’re not getting built. The affordable units being constructed by the private sector are all being produced through our affordable housing incentives and density bonuses. If we are given additional authority by the legislature, we would need to create a program that actually produces affordability, like we’ve done with the frequent transit development option under the missing middle policies.

Are you in favor of a light rail or another expansion of mass transit? 
Yes, we are building Bus Rapid Transit in Raleigh, which looks and feels like light rail. We have four routes planned, with the first route under construction on New Bern Avenue. We also already have Amtrak service that connects the region, and more regional rail is needed with more frequency and additional service. We need to become less car dependent and provide better options.

Do City Council Candidates Stand With Red Hat Amp?

Do City Council Candidates Stand With Red Hat Amp?

We asked all sitting members of Raleigh City Council—and other candidates vying for a seat—whether they stand with the expansion of Red Hat Amp.

With the vote deciding Red Hat Amphitheater’s fate in less than a month, we tapped Raleigh City Council candidates—plus the sitting Council members who are all up for reelection—on whether they think the venue should remain Downtown or be moved elsewhere (for example, Dix Park). 

Although only the current council members will have any say in the vote, other candidates’ take on the amphitheater’s location can give insight on their knowledge of Raleigh and priorities within the city. And, ICYMI, Red Hat Amp cannot be left where it is—it must be either moved one block and expanded or demolished for good. 

Mayoral Candidates

Janet Cowell
Red Hat [Amp] should stay Downtown. It helps make Downtown a regional destination for arts and culture and supports local businesses at a time when they urgently need it. In exchange for the negative externalities of closing a street, we should preserve pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular throughways while mitigating the impact of street closure on Heritage Park and insulating residents from service loading docks.

Paul Fitts 
Leave it where it is.

Eugene Myrick  
I am not in favor of moving Red Hat Amphitheater to Dix Park. While the amphitheater is a beloved venue, relocating it would have significant and far-reaching consequences that outweigh the potential benefits. Moving the amphitheater would negatively impact local businesses that have long benefited from its Downtown location. The foot traffic and economic activity generated by events at Red Hat Amphitheater support our small businesses, which are the backbone of our local economy. Disrupting this ecosystem could lead to closures and lost livelihoods for many who rely on this steady stream of patrons.

Terrance Ruth
The location of Red Hat Amphitheater should be determined by what best serves the community’s needs and enhances the cultural vibrancy of Raleigh. Keeping it Downtown supports local businesses and maintains the city’s cultural hub. However, moving it to Dix Park could offer unique opportunities, but the fragile nature of our Downtown requires the city’s full attention. I would advocate for extensive community input before making a decision.

James Shaughnessy IV
I am in favor of keeping Red Hat Amphitheater Downtown. It’s become a cultural staple in the area and plays a vital role in supporting local businesses by driving foot traffic and generating economic activity. Its presence Downtown is beneficial both for the economy and the cultural vibrancy of the city.

At-large Candidates

James Bledsoe
No. Red Hat [Amp] needs to stay where it is. Moving a large property like that to expand a Convention Center that isn’t full when events are held is just asking to hurt Downtown. Many businesses rely on foot traffic from the events. Moving Red Hat [Amp] during an already financially stressed Downtown Raleigh is just going to break a lot of businesses’ backs.

Joshua Bradley 
I am of the opinion that it can stay where it is. The Convention Center does not need to expand. The planned move would close South Street and negatively impact Heritage Park, which is one of the few public housing complexes in the City.

Stormie Forte (I)
Yes, I am in favor of the Red Hat Amphitheater expansion, while understanding the concerns regarding a closure of a small portion of [South Street]. Within the budget allocated for the project, the current plan is the only option available to keep the amphitheater Downtown. The City of Raleigh staff are working with the NC Department of Transportation to create a solution that will allow continued connectivity to the Downtown area from South Street. I have had the opportunity to speak with many owners of local small businesses regarding the negative economic impact of losing the amphitheater Downtown. I want to support initiatives that will help these establishments not only survive, but thrive. Red Hat Amphitheater has over 50 shows scheduled this season and eight weeks for the ice rink. Many Raleigh residents and guests from out of town enjoy coming Downtown for these events, and contribute significantly to the viability of surrounding businesses. It is important for the owners and their employees that these opportunities continue to create foot traffic in these spaces. 

Jonathan Melton (I)
Yes, and I want the city to work with NCDOT on reestablishing some connection for the portion of South Street that is closed, and to add bicycle and pedestrian improvements too. This project can be a win-win for all interested stakeholders.  

Reeves Peeler 
I want to see the amphitheater stay Downtown.

Robert Steele 
I am in favor of the Red Hat Amphitheater staying Downtown.

District A Candidates

Mary Black (I)
Neutral. I think the role of councilors is to weigh the multiple factors within in any case. I’m eager to hear from the city about the multiple factors that are at play with regard to impact to traffic, Heritage Park redevelopment and businesses. 

Whitney Hill 
I am in favor of seeing Red Hat [Amp] staying where it is and keeping Dawson Street a straight shot through Downtown. No one has shown me the cost profit analysis of doubling the size of the Civic Center. If they have [it], I would love to see it. To me, this is the real issue. Are the citizens at large really benefiting from the Civic Center Expansion?

Mitchell Silver
I am in favor of keeping Red Hat Amphitheater Downtown and would encourage City Council to explore and make public all available options, including those that keep South Street open. 

District B Candidates

Jennifer McCollum
Yes, I am in favor of Red Hat Amphitheater staying Downtown.

Megan Patton (I)
With roughly a month until the vote regarding the street closure, I am still in the information-gathering phase. This decision impacts several constituencies in a variety of ways. From Heritage Park to Downtown businesses, from Boylan Heights to the larger Raleigh community, I’m committed to hearing all the voices. No decision that the Council faces is ever as simple as it seems. I’m working hard to make sure we get as many wins for as many stakeholders as possible.

District C Candidates

Corey Branch (I)
I’m in favor of keeping Red Hat Amphitheater Downtown. 

DaQuanta Copeland
Yes, I support the Red Hat Amphitheater staying Downtown. 

Tomara DeCosta
It should remain Downtown, as local businesses depend on the foot traffic it generates. 

Daniel Grant-King
No response as of press time. 

Jared Ollison 
If Red Hat is to be expanded, I think it would be a good idea to consider moving it to Dix Park. 

Tolulope Omokaiye
I am in favor of the Red Hat Amphitheater remaining Downtown. 

Portia Rochelle
In favor of [Red Hat Amp] staying Downtown

District D Candidates

Jane Harrison (I)
I’m committed to Red Hat Amphitheater remaining Downtown and anticipate it to be moved one block south to make room for the Convention Center expansion. It has significant economic spillover impacts on local businesses like Berkeley Cafe, Videri Chocolate Factory, and Neptunes, just to name a few. It’s a beloved community asset—essential for vibrancy and safety Downtown.

Residents and business owners also have legitimate concerns about the loss of vehicular access on South Street. Unfortunately, closing the street is a prerequisite to expansion of the Convention Center and the Red Hat [Amp] relocation. I’ve spent a great deal of time with city staff and impacted neighbors to examine the plans and identify opportunities to mitigate potential negative impacts. City staff is working with the NC Department of Transportation to develop a new route which would connect just south of South Street heading west to east. The City is also conducting a traffic-impact analysis to evaluate impacts. An additional community engagement opportunity will be held prior to any City Council decision.

District E Candidates

John Cerqueira
Red Hat should absolutely stay Downtown at a scale that continues attracting the types of shows we have been fortunate to host in the past. I do look forward to the potential of a music venue at Dix Park at what is planned to be a scale closer to what we have at the NC Museum of Art. 

Christina Jones (I)
No response as of press time. 

Mayoral + City Council Candidates Cheat Sheet

Mayoral + City Council Candidates Cheat Sheet

Here’s who is officially running for mayor and City Council.

Election season is upon us, and 26 candidates with a deep desire to bring change to Raleigh have thrown their names into the ring for mayor and City Council. Now that the filing period is officially over, the ballot is set, with all incumbents seeking reelection except for Mayor Mary-Ann Baldwin. 

Raleighites haven’t been known to race to the polls for location elections, but keep in mind those who are elected and the decisions they make will directly affect you. Hot button issues this year include development and infrastructure, law enforcement shortages, affordable housing, DTR crime, transit, and so on. 

As campaign season kicks off, here’s a district-by-district snapshot of who’s running and the issues at stake.

For full interviews with the incumbents and other candidates that declared intent earlier this year, see our extended ballot guide. 

Mayor

Councilman Corey Branch previously filed for mayor, but withdrew his candidacy on July 16 and announced he will be seeking reelection in District C. 

City Council 

At-large 

District A 

District B 

District C 

District D

District E

Who Will Lead Our City?

Who Will Lead Our City?

A district-by-district guide outlining each area, its residents’ primary concerns and the candidates who hope to represent them.

While we won’t vote until November—and the filing period isn’t until July—the race for City Council is already heating up, with both incumbents and new faces declaring they intend to run. 

Historically, Raleigh isn’t known to exactly race to the ballot box for municipal elections, but—newsflash—we should. Though, this year, the draw of the simultaneous federal election is likely to boost turnout. The so-what factor for local elections, though, really boils down to the direct impact City Council plays on our day-to-day lives: development (NIMBYs and YIMBYs raise your hands), affordable—and attainable—housing (aka the missing middle), crime, transit and so on. 

Now on the heels of electing Raleigh’s youngest and most diverse council in our city’s history—and after two years of many deadlocked votes and stalled efforts—all eyes are on this year’s race. As of now, all current council members aim to hold their seats, save District C’s Corey Branch, who has his sights set on the mayoral office (see “Who’s Next?” sidebar below). 

But those incumbents aren’t stopping a wide range of first-timers and previous contenders from throwing their hats in the ring in hopes of bringing their visions for the city to fruition. As campaign season kicks off, here’s a district-by-district snapshot of who’s running and the issues at stake.

Enter your address in this interactive map to find your district.

COUNCIL COMPOSITION: As a quick refresher, Raleigh City Council has eight seats—one representative of each of the city’s five districts, plus three members elected at-large, including the mayor. 

Who’s Next?

As Mary-Ann Baldwin’s run as mayor comes to a close, here are the current candidates vying for the role of Raleigh’s next mayor.

At-Large Candidates

Jonathan Melton (I)
Proudest accomplishment: Public safety efforts, effort to increase salary of first responders and progress on public transit
Top issues: Public safety, transit and housing affordability
Plan to keep? Participatory budgeting implemented this year

“[I hope] to do the work required that continues to make Raleigh one of the best cities in the country to live for everyone,” says Melton. The incumbent member at-large was first elected to Raleigh City Council in 2019, earning reelection in 2022. In this role, he currently serves as vice chair of the Transportation & Transit Committee and chair of the Economic Development and Innovation Committee, and has tackled issues such as discrimination in private employment, increased pay for first responders and reduction of car-dependency. As the first openly LGBTQ+ city council member, Melton has championed safe, inclusive spaces for the LGBTQ+ community and allies as a founding board member of
Stonewall Sports. 

Stormie D. Forte (I)
Proudest accomplishment: Updates to nondiscrimination ordinances and the CROWN Act
Top issues: Housing affordability, transit and tackling homelessness
Plan to keep? A well-managed city

“Being able to effectively balance what’s in the best interest of the [city] and its residents, as well as economic opportunities,” says Forte of what is most important to her. When the lawyer and radio host was appointed to represent District D in 2020, she became the first Black woman to serve on City Council before going on to serve as member at-large in 2022. To date, Forte has promoted the safety and inclusion of minorities and members of the LGBTQ+ communities, from supporting the CROWN Act (protecting rights to wear natural hairstyles) to updating nondiscrimination ordinances. If reelected for a third term, Forte has her sights set on building efficient public transit and solving the growing homelessness issue in the city. “I would love to say we solved the homelessness crisis. … We need to look for humane ways to tackle the issue.”

Reeves Peeler
Why this year: Raleigh is at a pivotal moment—and growth is leaving our working-class and even many of our middle-class neighbors behind.
End-of-term goal: Fight to create a city that everyone can thrive in
Plan to keep? Fare-free public transit

“I want to look back and say I built a coalition of people in Raleigh that will fight to create a city everyone can thrive in for years to come,” says Peeler. Currently the regional organizer at Down Home NC, the born-and-raised Raleighite decided this pivotal moment was the right time to run because of the city’s growing economy and population—paired with his growing concern that the city’s infrastructure is beginning to exclude lower- and middle-class residents. Peeler aims to adopt ordinances and zoning laws encouraging more affordable construction by taking each unique neighborhood into consideration. “We can’t continue to force our neighbors who are teachers, nurses, public servants and service workers to drive longer and longer commutes and live farther from the center of the city.”

James Bledsoe
Why this year: Crime increasing, housing and business reform, and the city canceling the Veterans Day Parade
End-of-term goal: Reform the pay system for RFD & RPD to allow them to live within city limits
Plan to keep? Keep new ideas from the city government flowing

“I want to reform the pay system for RFD and RPD that allows them to stay here, to create a standard for the rest of the state and ultimately make Raleigh a safer city where employees are not burnt out by high call volumes and being overworked,” says Bledsoe. The combat veteran decided to run after his outrage over the cancellation of the Veterans Day Parade and the city’s growing crime rates, aiming to use this term to increase first responder pay rates and take fiscal responsibility by reforming the city manager office. In hopes of building more houses and condos and less apartments, Bledsoe aims to deregulate zoning laws to bring housing reform. And if elected, Bledsoe vows his paycheck to a scholarship for Raleigh high school students studying STEM or a trade. “We will not only help the youth, but provide skilled people to enter the workforce for a better NC.”

Joshua Bradley
Why this year: The housing affordability crisis and worsening gentrification
End-of-term goal: A reprioritization of the city to focus on building a better city for all of its residents, starting with the workers and poor
Plan to keep? The alternative response program getting started by Refund Raleigh 

“I am running to help my fellow workers get another voice at the table,” says Bradley. The accountant and Occupy Raleigh activist is throwing his hat in the ring for a second time, after a highly contested 2022 election. Both a member of the North Carolina Green Party and the Socialist Party USA, Bradley aims to reduce crime by building low-cost housing and protecting Black, brown and Indigenous communities from gentrification in order to create a more equitable and equal city. Voicing his stance against oppression of Palestine and his disappointment in the council’s failed ceasefire resolution, Bradley hopes to take a stance against “oppression in all of its forms” for the people of Raleigh who have lost loved ones to federally funded weapons. 

District A

Area: North Hills, Six Forks Road and Falls of Neuse Road

Encompassing Midtown, District A has emerged as a live, work, play hub, boasting vibrant hospitality, green spaces and nightlife via a swath of continued development (see: The Exchange and the burgeoning North Hills Innovation District—to name but a few). 

As one of fastest-growing districts in the city, rezoning issues will remain front of mind—and in front of council—and this district rep will have to navigate the likely ongoing deadlock between developers and community pushback. 

That development and growth will continue to entangle traffic as frustrations mount for denizens and commuters alike. While the Six Forks expansion project between Rowan and Millbrook set to begin in late 2025 was finally (unanimously) green-lighted by council this February to much fanfare, the long-awaited updates—including widening to six median-divided lanes with a walking and biking path—only updates 1 mile. Dating back to a first transportation bond in 2013, the initial project was slated to update a 2-mile span of Six Forks before the plan was slashed by ~50% to keep within the city’s budget. Translation: Six Forks—NTM Falls of Neuse—is a long road and solutions are paramount.

Further exploring options to navigate throughout the area and to/from DTR, the Northern Corridor Bus Rapid Transit plan looks to implement a fast and reliable route from Downtown to Midtown.  

And, beyond mobility, with density—both from development and denizens—emergency response has also become a hot-button issue for the area. If—or when—the next fire burns, the next rep will have to answer the call to ensure North Hills’ smaller Station 9 is ready and equipped to respond.

District A Candidates

Mitchell Silver
How long you’ve been a Raleighite: 2005–14; 2021
to present 
Why this year: I want to offer leadership to make sure the city goes in the right direction. 
End-of-term goal: Ensure housing choices for all 
Something you don’t plan to change: Approach on affordable housing and parks

“I want to make sure the city continues to go on the right track. It has momentum, and I’m concerned with the perceived deadlock at council,” says Silver of why he chose to run this year. As Raleigh’s former planning director and chief planning officer and NYC’s former parks commissioner, Silver excels at creating thoughtful and visionary comprehensive plans—including Raleigh’s own 2030 Comprehensive Plan—and aims to focus on quality growth, public safety and real conversations about housing choice and what that means. “I have a keen interest in making sure we continue being the best planned city in the U.S.,” he says. 

Mary Black (I)
As of June 22, Mary Black announced her candidacy.

Whitney Hill
How long you’ve been a Raleighite: Over 40 years
Why this year: With growing homelessness and rising crime, I am compelled to get involved.
End-of-term goal: A three-year plan to introduce competitive pay for police officers 
Something you don’t plan to change: The parks system and greenway

Whitney Hill

Hill feels that something in Raleigh is wrong, and electing established candidates and liberals isn’t the answer. “We need new blood in the city council that will work for the best policies, where all of the city residents will benefit from our rapid growth,” says Hill. Currently the director of U.S. operations at JS Panther, he has grown concerned with the amount of homelessness and crime in the city, and vows to increase police pay to combat this issue. The NC State graduate also aims to solve prominent issues he believes the current administration is overlooking. “Our public comment sessions on city council meetings are dominated by anti-Israel protesters that divert attention away from local issues,” he says. “I look to bring common sense to city management.” 

Area: Capital Boulevard, I-540, Falls of Neuse Road, Louisburg Road

Affordable housing is a hot topic in Raleigh right now—and doesn’t look to be cooling any time soon. But impassioned constituents of this sprawling northeast district are concerned with advocating for the city to work with, rather than for, developers regarding the promotion of naturally occurring affordable housing. This district rep will need to lead the conversation between developers and the community, and be ready to negotiate and compromise when their goals don’t align.

Of course, more development means more traffic. A perceived win for concerned—and super-involved—residents, speed limits in Carlton Park and Holden Ridge were recently lowered as a result of citizen-initiated efforts, and more subdivisions are likely to jump on that bandwagon as explosive population growth continues—and the roads continue to become ensnarled. 

East Raleigh’s rep will need to continue to field concerns and make headway to better handle and reduce congestion for the ~59K vehicles that pass through on the daily—like the multiyear $37.34 million updates to Louisburg Road slated for a 2027 wrap.

District B Candidate

Megan Patton (I)
How long you’ve been a Raleighite: Eight years
Proudest accomplishment: Led on getting the needed budget and policy adjustments to provide all fire stations Wi-Fi
Top issues: Affordable housing, climate action and managing our infrastructure for growth, including solid waste services, fire service and police coverage
Something you don’t plan to change: Equity and inclusion at the forefront of our city department’s programs and policies 

Before her first term on city council, Patton was a public school teacher, factory worker and food-service employee—and vows she won’t shy away from hard work anytime soon. During her present term, Patton has secured funding to offset rent increases for residents of Grosvenor Gardens, and currently serves on the Safe, Vibrant & Healthy Neighborhoods Committee and the Growth & Natural Resources Committee. If reelected, she hopes to see progress on Forestville Road Park and the Northern BRT line. “I’ve aimed to provide strong constituent service alongside researched and balanced decision-making,” says Patton. “I love caring for our city, and I hope voters will afford me the opportunity to do so for another two years.”

Currently Unopposed

District C

Area: Downtown/South Wilmington Street and Capital Boulevard 

After nine years representing District C, Councilman Corey Branch has thrown his hat in the mayoral race, and, to date, no potential contenders have declared candidacy for his council seat. 

With part of the district encompassing Southeast Raleigh and the eastern side of Downtown, the future council member faces a multitude of critical issues, not least of which is reenergizing DTR and inspiring a return to our city’s core—to work, to play, to live, to shop, to dine. From securing funding for a set of recommendations to revitalize Fayetteville Street’s strollways, streetscapes, outdoor dining, art, bathrooms and beyond (a corridor that runs through both Districts C and D) to navigating burgeoning development, this rep will be at the forefront of a rapidly rising city.

Beyond development and activations, crime has been a central concern for the district. While reported crimes have decreased 43% in the last six months after last summer’s surge, city officials and stakeholders have acknowledged much work is still needed to fortify these efforts—and we can’t take our foot off the gas. Thus, this district rep will be faced with finding solutions for myriad concerns, including bus station-related loitering and crime, as well as reducing the impact of the current law enforcement shortage.

No Announced Candidates In District C

District D

Area: Parts of Wade Avenue, South Wilmington Street, Duraleigh Road,  NC State, Western Boulevard, Glenwood South, Lake Wheeler Road

Primed to be Raleigh’s next “it” destination, West Raleigh is experiencing explosive growth with long underdeveloped sectors in the midst of total transformation. For starters, see the Blue Ridge Corridor—aka the urban hotbed comprising the triangle from Blue Ridge to Western to Edwards Mill—billed as the next North Hills. (Of note, while the triangle of development is fully situated in District D, the area itself is split among D and E.)

Then, of course, there’s the PNC Arena reno project, NTM the mass upgrades along Wade Avenue, surrounding NC State and Western Boulevard, and Lake Wheeler’s multimodal “complete street” revamp to include a peanut-shaped roundabout, and so on, igniting the region with mixed-use office, residential and highly amenable retail. Additionally, PNC’s upgrades will only serve to solidify the area as an entertainment mecca. But all that growth won’t come without its own share of setbacks, from construction to traffic delays, etc., that whoever is elected will certainly have to navigate. 

And, as in District C, in this district spanning Glenwood South and portions of DTR, continuing to curb crime and implement solutions for our law enforcement shortage will likewise be a chief concern. 

District D Candidates

Jane Harrison (I)
How long you’ve been a Raleighite: Since 2015
Proudest accomplishment: Negotiated public benefits in every rezoning case
Top issues: Community engagement, affordable housing and the environment
Something you don’t plan to change: Raleigh as a leader in environmental stewardship and city staff on a constant quest for sustainability

“I bring the bacon—or vegan sausage—home for District D,” says Harrison. The NC State environmental economist and district incumbent is the only candidate who has announced a campaign for the district—and she has big plans for the area. In addition to housing reform and continued environmental stewardship, Harrison is eager to see further progress on an alternative crisis response program and utilizing social workers to assist community members in need. “We have already approved a planning study, and community engagement is underway to determine how best to support residents struggling with mental health, substance and alcohol abuse; homelessness; and other challenges that go beyond our current public safety infrastructure.”

Currently Unopposed

Area: West Raleigh encompassing such major roads as parts of Wade Avenue, Blue Ridge Road, I-440, Brier Creek Parkway, Wake Forest Road

The expansion of this booming district has led to more than its fair share of traffic, clogging up roads that weren’t designed for the number of people who now rely on them every day (read: I-440 and segments of Glenwood Avenue near Crabtree Valley Mall and the Brier Creek area). 

Beyond the overlapping portions of the burgeoning Blue Ridge Corridor bringing upgrades aplenty to the area, the RDU quarry expansion is a central focus for residents. In early April, the Umstead Coalition announced the already-controversial project is using 14 acres over what was allocated, overstepping their boundaries into William B. Umstead State Park—a space intended for hiking, biking and outdoor recreation. 

As the state prepares to resurvey the land to determine a mapping discrepancy, the district representative will need to address constituents’ concerns before possible mining begins in two years. 

Beyond development wars, attainable housing, green spaces, traffic (think any crawling trek down Glenwood from Brier Creek to Crabtree) and such proliferative nuisance crimes as speeding, car racing, etc., continue to be front of mind.

District E Candidates

John Cerqueira
How long you’ve been a Raleighite: On-again-off-again life in Raleigh started in 1997 during freshman year at NC State.
Why this year: The current tenor of the council has taken a combative, unproductive and, ultimately, dysfunctional turn, mirroring the divisiveness that we see in national and state politics. 
End-of-term goal: Progress and completion of open space, park and greenway projects 
Something you don’t plan to change: Raleigh citizens are given better opportunities to engage with our elected officials, particularly in terms of
how we grow as a city.

After graduating from NC State in 2001, Cerqueira moved to NYC to work at the World Trade Center, helping save an employee during the 9/11 attacks. “Helping a fellow human being out of our tower fueled my interest in finding different ways to serve in both my personal and professional life,” says the co-founder of Skate Raleigh and founder/current principal of Pinwheel Associates. If he secures a seat on council, Cerqueira vows to take a more collaborative, thoughtful and respectful approach to governing to ensure the energy being poured into our city brings more blessing than burden. “If we are going to find sustainable ways to evolve in the face of the inevitable change brought by population growth, this feels like a time for me to help apply my passion for service and my professional experience to improve how we work together.” 

Christina Jones (I) 
How long you’ve been a Raleighite: Since 2011
Proudest accomplishment: Reinstating Citizen Advisory Councils (aka CACs)
Top issues: Workers’ rights and reducing our vacancy rate citywide
Something you don’t plan to change: The Community Engagement Department is doing a fantastic job at reaching many segments of our community.

Dubbing herself the “community engagement candidate,” Jones edged former incumbent David Knight out of the district seat to snag her spot on council in the 2022 election. “Reinstating Citizen Advisory Councils was the icing on the cake because it was what first sparked my interest in running for council,” says the district incumbent and community engagement champion. Now that engagement is up to her standards, Jones plans to use this upcoming term to tackle the citywide vacancy rate and workers’ rights in order to prevent the quality of service provided to residents from suffering. “I have spent my first term working shifts across multiple departments to better understand what our staff does and how City Council can better represent their needs.”